Revealing indexicality in situated writing: Negotiating second-language politeness indexes in job application letters

Negotiating second-language politeness indexes in job application letters


  • Dacia Dressen-Hammouda University Clermont Auvergne


Palabras clave:

French politeness norms, indexical analysis, indexicality, international writers, inter-indexicality, job application letters


Writing proficiently in any language requires knowing about much more than grammar, lexis, register, genres, audience and rhetorical situation. It also requires that writers call upon implicit sociocultural and contextual inferences made via indexes. Indexes convey a wide range of sociocultural information about social background, professional and cultural identity, affective and epistemological positioning, gender and ethnicity. The ways in which this information is indexed, however, can vary significantly from one language to another, making indexicality a significant concern for international writers as they negotiate their positions through writing. This paper describes a novel method in writing research, indexical analysis, which is used to describe how French politeness norms are indexed in application letters written in English by first-language (L1) French students. It was found that although the students’ writing was considered grammatically correct, divergences in terms of where and how politeness was expressed resulted in a negative evaluation by readers. Developing more conscious awareness of the implicit norms that organize thoughts and attitudes for both writers and readers may allow for better recognition of how indexes can differ across languages.


Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press.

Anticona, G. (2016). Les lettres des ambassadeurs à Rome et autres agents. Tomes VII et VIII (Edition commentée) 1584-1588. Master 2 Histoire moderne et contemporaine, Université Lumière - Lyon 2.

Atkinson, D. (1999). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

Banks, D. (2017). The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, 1665-1700. Equinox.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.

Beaufort, A. (1999). Writing in the real world: Making the transition from school to work. Teachers College Press.

Beebee, T. (1994). The ideology of genre: A comparative study of generic instability. Pennsylvania State University Press.

Berkenkotter, C. (2008). Patient tales: Case histories and the uses of narrative in psychiatry. University of South Carolina Press.

Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614.

Burdelski, M. (2014). Language socialization and politeness routines. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B.B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The handbook of language socialization (pp. 275-295). Wiley-Blackwell.

Burani, P. (1879). Guide-manuel de la civilité française, ou Nouveau code de la politesse et du savoir-vivre. Hachette BNF.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2022). Language diversity in academic writing: Toward decolonizing scholarly publishing. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(2), 107-128.

Cargill, M. & Burgess, S. (Eds.). (2017). Publishing research in English as an additional language: Practices, pathways and potentials. University of Adelaide Press.

Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. The University of Michigan Press.

D’Iribarne, P. (1989). La logique de l’honneur: Gestion des entreprises et traditions nationales. Éditions Seuil.

D’Iribarne, P. (2006). L’étrangeté française. Éditions Seuil.

Davila, B. (2012). Indexicality and “standard” edited American English: Examining the link between conceptions of standardness and perceived authorial identity. Written Communication, 29(2), 180–207.

Devitt, A., Reiff, M. J., Bawarshi, A. (2004). Scenes of writing: Strategies for composing with genres. Longman-Pearson.

Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2013). Politeness strategies in the job application letter: Implications of intercultural rhetoric for designing writing feedback. ASp, 64, 139-159.

Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2014). Place and space as shapers of disciplinary identity: The role of indexicality in the emergence of disciplinary writing expertise. In J. Bamford, F. Poppi, & D. Mazzi (Eds.), Space, place and the discursive construction of identity (pp. 71-106). Peter Lang.

Dressen-Hammouda, D. (in preparation). Indexicality and international academic publishing: A framework for ESP research. Routledge.

Duranti, A. (2004). Agency in language. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 451-473). Blackwell Publishing.

Fisher, R. (1997). La pédagogie de la politesse dans l’école laïque de la Troisième République. Romantisme, 96, 41-49.

Flowerdew, J. (2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52(2), 249-260.

Freedman, A. (1999). Beyond the text: Towards understanding the teaching and learning of genres. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 764–768.

Geertz, C. (1973). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books.

Gerholm, T. (2011). Children’s development of facework practices: An emotional endeavor. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3099-3110.

Guillén-Galve, I. & Bocanegra-Valle, A. (Eds.) (2021). Ethnographies of academic writing research: Theory, methods, and interpretation. John Benjamins.

Held, G. (1999). Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: Reflections on the verbalisation of social power relations. Pragmatics, 9, 21-36.

Henry, A. (2007). Evaluating language learners’ response to web-based, data-driven, genre teaching materials. English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), 462–484.

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & E. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings(pp. 269-293). Penguin.

Jolibert, B. (2002). La politesse et l’éducation à la civilité. In G. Ferréol (Ed.), Rapport à autrui et personne citoyenne(pp. 279-298). Septentrion.

Jones, R. H. (2016). Spoken discourse. Bloomsbury Academic.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2011). From good manners to facework: Politeness variations and constants in France, from the classic age to today. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 12(1-2), 133-155.

Kuteeva, M. (2022). Negotiating space for multilingualism in English-medium writing: Authors, reviewers, editors. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17, 129-137.

Le Roux, N. (September 13, 2021). 51 formules de politesse pour vos emails, lettres et lettres de motivation. La Langue Française.

Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388.

Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Moreno, A. (2010). Researching into English for research publication purposes from an applied intercultural perspective. In M. Ruiz-Garrido, J. Palmer-Silveira, & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), English for professional and academic purposes (pp. 57-71). Rodopi.

Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335-358). Cambridge University Press.

Okamura, A. & Shaw, P. (2000). Lexical phrases, culture, and subculture in transactional letter writing. English for Specific Purposes, 19(1), 1-15.

Paltridge, B. (2017). The discourse of peer review: Reviewing submissions to academic journals. Palgrave Macmillan.

Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.

Pérez-Llantada, C. (2021). Research genres across languages: Multilingual communication online. Cambridge University Press.

Pérez-Llantada, C., Plo, R., & Ferguson, G. R. (2011). “You don’t say what you know, only what you can”: The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 18-30.

Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504-554.

Salager-Meyer, F., Alcaraz Ariza, M. Á., & Zambrano, N. (2003). The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930-1995). English for Specific Purposes, 22, 223-247.

Scollon, R. & Wong Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge.

Seidlhofer, B. (2002). Pedagogy and local learner corpora: Working with learning-driven data. Language Learning & Language Teaching, 6, 214-234.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1-4), 209-232.

Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3-4), 193-229.

Strauss, S. & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis: A multi-perspective and multilingual approach. Routledge.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Taavitsainen, I. (2001). Evidentiality and scientific thought-styles: English medical writing in Late Middle English and Early Modern English. In M. Gotti & M. Dossena (Eds.), Modality in specialized texts. Selected papers of the first CERLIS Conference (pp. 21-52). Peter Lang.

Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 142-164.

Upton, T. & Connor, U. (2001). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 313-329.

Valle, E. (1999). A collective intelligence. The life sciences in the Royal Society as a scientific discourse community, 1665-1965 (Anglicana Turkuensia, 17). University of Turku.


76 vistas





Monográfico de Lingüística